The primary management strategies for BCVI include
observation, surgical repair, antithrombotic drugs, and
endovascular therapy. In determining the treatment for
an individual, the location and grade of the injury (Table
1) as well as symptomatology must all be considered.32
Given the high morbidity and mortality rates
historically associated with untreated BCVI, observation
should not be chosen unless there are contraindications
to alternative strategies. Currently, surgical therapy
for BCVI is limited. Grade I injuries are associated
with a low enough stroke risk that surgical repair is
not justified. Repair is warranted in higher-grade
injuries, but surgical access is often precluded by
involvement of the carotid artery at the base of the
skull.11
Consequently, nonsurgical management is the first-line
treatment of BCVI. There are no published prospective
randomized studies comparing treatment strategies;
management recommendations are made based on
retrospective analyses of patients managed per
institutional protocols. Early reports recommended
systemic anticoagulation with heparin (no bolus; 10
U/kg/h to target partial thromboplastin time 40–50 s),
demonstrating improved neurologic outcomes among
symptomatic patients and stroke prevention among
asymptomatic patients.5,11,12
A few retrospective, uncontrolled case series,33–35
as well as more recent large reports from Memphis19
and Denver36
suggest that systemic heparinization and antiplatelet
therapy (clopidogrel 75 mg daily or aspirin 325 mg
daily) are equally efficacious in stroke prevention. In
the absence of controlled data, systemic heparin may be
preferred among patients with neurologic symptoms and in
those who have no contraindications. The Memphis data5
demonstrate systemic heparinization’s clear efficacy in
improving neurologic outcomes among symptomatic
patients. Furthermore, although statistical significance
was not achieved, the large series in Denver11
suggests that heparin may be superior to antiplatelet
therapy in stroke prevention (p
=
0.07) and in neurologic improvement after ischemic
insult (p
=
0.15).